New World Order – Take a Bow!

7 10 2008

 

The world has long been ruled by the capitalists – developed economies of the likes of the US, UK, Japan, Italy, Germany and France. It is now time for a paradigm shift and the emergence of the new age economies.

The last decade or so has seen the rise of quite a few countries – economies which had for long, shown potential but for some reason or the other, had not quite been able to come to grips with the world economic order. I am talking about countries like India, China, Vietnam from Asia, South Africa from Africa, Brazil from the Latin Americas and Russia from Europe.

Goldman Sachs had a few years back taken out a roadmap for who they thought would be the economies to watch out for in the years leading up to 2050. BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) they called it. These were 4 of the largest growing economies of the world with a potential to upturn the G6 countries.

The report had gone on to say that China with its large populace and abundant resources will offset USA as the world’s largest economy. Moreover, India could actually become the world’s 3rd largest economy come 2040. The demand from the BRIC countries could rival the current G6 and dwarf it in the next 40-50 years! All the BRIC countries have posted consistent economic growth since 2001, despite the global economic downturn of 2001-2002. In 2007, economic growth registered 4.4%, 7.0%, 8.9% and 11.5% for Brazil, Russia, India and China respectively.

Coming to the fore now are a group of countries called the Next 11 or the N-11 for short which include Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Korea, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Turkey and Vietnam.

These are the new age economies which are following on behind the BRIC countries. Those countries following the BRIC path will typically experience high rates of population growth, creating a growing pool of potential consumers, at the same time as rising disposable incomes. They all share characteristics of rapidly growing populations combined with significant industrial capacity or potential.

I found a few points from the most loved Euromonitor archive – the lifeline of most data-based IIT research work and I quote:

·         All of these countries have large and growing populations. Between 1980 and 2008, population growth was highest in Pakistan at 110.8%, with the lowest being in South Korea, with 28.4% period growth;

·         Of the N11 countries, Indonesia had the largest population as of January 2008, with 228.9 million people, while South Korea had the smallest at 47.6 million;

·         In 2006, Mexico had the highest sum of private final consumption expenditure, totaling US$567 billion. Vietnam had the lowest, at US$36.8 billion;

·         All 11 countries demonstrate population growth rates above those of Western developed economies, indicating greater consumer market potential over the medium term. Large populations represent a wide potential pool of consumers for businesses to target; while high growth rates mean that this market will expand rapidly, providing proportionally more potential customers.

It is also important to note that while the emerging nations all exhibit similar characteristics, the actual absolute values are quite dissimilar. While China is well on its way to becoming a world power, Brazil has not progressed at the same rate – in fact Brazil has fallen behind the rate , so to speak! Critical issues that Brazil faces are Foreign and public debt constraints, Infrastructure and Openness to trade. It also faces a whole plethora of challenges like lack of openness, lower education levels, lower savings and investment, higher public and foreign debt.

 

Ok! So what can the world expect as a result of this new world order?

1.       A shift in economic power towards Asia.

2.       The rise and reshaping of regional networks.

3.       Changing consumption and production patterns.

4.       A flow of capital back to the BRICs as the world rebalances.

5.       Appreciation – through exchange rates or through prices?

6.       The need to reshape international institutions.

7.       A large income pool can emerge in these countries

8.       There could be a dramatic rise in the middle class of these countries

 

A reality check on what the rise of emerging economies mean to the word!

·         The economic expansion of the emerging economies will contribute to an increased pressure on the global resource base especially of oil and coal as also basic necessities like food.

·         The growing need for oil across these countries would mean that the oil prices are going to go up further.

·         Inflation is going to increase and so are the commodity prices.

·         There is a smaller global income inequality than it used to be but in some countries, the internal income inequality might have increased! This could trigger domestic political pressures and encourage protectionist policymaking rather than measures aimed at enhancing aggregate economic growth. It could also lead to volatility in incomes.

·         There is a change in the mindset of the people in terms of where they seek employment now. Just came upon this survey which quotes that 70% of all respondents (643 in number) now want to go to the BRIC countries for employment.

 

 

 

So which “future-power” will outpace all others?

Well it is easy to see that China has taken a head-start. What India is today is what China was 20-30 years back. But the rate of growth of China is slowly beginning to dwindle and will stabilize around the 3-3.5% mark. Russia has long been threatening to be an economic world power. During and post the Cold War, Russia has showed glimpses of almost tipping over to a developed economy. But internal politics and a West-facing world curbed its growth. The increase in the number of Russian billionaires recently is a result of Russians now being allowed to invest outside their country. That Roman Abrahamovic is such a popular figure in English football now is a testimony to the growing popularity of Russians abroad. Russian company Gaz taking over LDV based in UK was also a landmark in popularizing Russia’s growing ascendancies. Korea is a developed economy but owing to the lack of resources, it will never be able to ensure a constant rate of growth. South Africa has one of the highest per capita incomes but nothing in the economy to boost the growth. They have a stagnant population and hence the per capita income will go up further. Pakistan, Bangladesh and Vietnam are on the right track but internal turmoil and frequent change in governments will hinder their quest for economic excellence.

 

But the nationalist in me still seems to vouch for India to be the world’s biggest superpower in the years to come. With an abundant, young population which is beaming with energy and talent, we can surely make a difference. There are more Indians in the World’s Richest list than ever before. There is a steady growth and moderately growing inflation. We need a credible fiscal policy and liberalized financial markets, we need to improve infrastructure and increase quality and efficiency and that will pave the way for economic superiority.

 

 





An Ode to the Spirit that is Entrepreneurship!

6 10 2008

 

 

The way of the entrepreneur _

 

I had a random chat with a few guys from class this morning over chai and I couldn’t help but pop in a question in the midst of all other discussions. I asked them if they had thought about the possibilities of starting up a venture soon after college. Its one of those questions which shouldn’t cause a shudder; one which is oft-discussed in the regular B-School grad get-togethers. You would expect the students of a well-acknowledged Business School to be thinking along the lines of “entrepreneurship” – or so I thought!

1 amongst the 15 odd was close to being sure about starting-up. 3 said they would consider it as an option in 5 years time while the rest were vehement in declining it as a viable consideration.

So, do we quickly come to a conclusion that we, the B-School student community are SUPPOSED to be corporate “servants”? What could possibly be the cause for the brightest management minds of the country shying away from being managers in the true spirit? Is this a lost cause or do we have time to do something about this? I wondered…

Careful deliberation in my head helped me enlist a few reasons why smart 20-somethings would not take this up:

·         Follow on support to a business plan

·         Debts and loans to clear post education

·         Lack of collateral/ No ‘Godfather’

·         Lack of industry experience

·         Alternate personal priorities

·         An unsupportive backing from family and friends

·         Lack of a trustworthy network

·         Lack of motivation or confidence in self

·         Averse to risk taking

One or more of the above is usually why one would rather take up being a “servant” than be a “master” of one’s own.

A little bit about myself – I have 36 months of work experience across various domains. I think I have a good understanding of the way business functions having been associated with different companies at various levels across the value chain. I have good interpersonal skills and a decent command over spoken language. Does that automatically make me a candidate to start up? Well, with 2 retired parents who are banking on me to take care of them when they need me, can I be selfish enough to take the “risk” of a new business? NO. Have I ever thought about starting my own venture? Yes, of course. And it will happen, in due course of time, I am sure.

Racking up a sound business plan is just a start – to follow will involve a little luck amongst other things. In such a context, risk is always a consideration.

 

I have been pretty choosy about the usage of the word ENTREPRENEUR. What is an entrepreneur?

Baumol in 1983 said that an entrepreneur is:

 (1) The one who creates and, perhaps, organizes and operates the start-up firm whether there is something innovative on such acts or not; and

(2) Someone who transforms ideas and inventions in economically viable entities, whether he has created a business or not.

 

8 Traits of Successful Entrepreneurs

 

So what does an entrepreneur need to have?

An entrepreneur should have

          Originality and motivation

          Moderate risk aversion

          Owning up responsibility

          Knowledge of results of his actions

          Long term planning

 

Some say that an entrepreneur is born “with it” while another school of thought believes that this can be inculcated through proper education and training by family, school and peers. A friend I know left a posh white collar job upon passing out of IIM Bangalore to chase his dream of operating in the leather industry. His weekly trips to the Italy and China fill me with envy but I know a son of a chemicals factory owner had it in him to start off on his own with or without the MBA degree, more so with it!

 

I think a lot more is expected out of a business school student. In-depth knowledge of business with working case analyses means that given the intellectual capital of graduates, the quality of their ventures should be correspondingly high.

There is no dearth of courses on Entrepreneurship in universities abroad. Another statistic to note is that in the USA and Japan between 2 per cent and 2.5 per cent of graduates immediately start their own business, while in the UK just over 1 per cent do. In India, however, such cases can literally be counted on one’s hand. I remember a few success stories coming out of the elite IIMs but the fact that they get importance is also a testimony to the fact that such cases are few and far between.

What can we do to inculcate the spirit of entrepreneurs amongst the B School graduates? A few suggestions…

1.      B-Schools need to actively be involved in helping seeding possible to deserving proposals. I know of the Entrepreneurial Development Cell at IIT Delhi which not only helps incubate but also supports the start-up. This will encourage the students more.

2.      B-Schools need to have entrepreneurship as a possible major option in their MBA. I know of colleges like some IIMs, IIFT, Symbiosis etc which have a course on entrepreneurship. We need to help students follow through.

3.      Some institutes like Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India train budding entrepreneurs. B Schools need to align themselves with such institutes.

4.      B-School graduates across the country can get together and form a club like is the case in many American universities. They can then approach VC’s and Angel investors as a group. Some companies like Goldman Sachs have been known to provide help to start-ups.

5.      Traditional business school programmes emphasize the large established corporation over the small or start-up venture and nurture the follower and steward over the leader, creator and risk taker. This needs to change.

6.      Workshops, case studies, competitions, mentoring, collaborative tasks, goal-driven tasks, intellectual discovery, activities that heighten thinking, and activities that provide practice in learning skills should be introduced. These help enrich the “Entrepreneurial Spirit”.

7.      A network between faculty teaching entrepreneurs across the world is a must.

8.      Entrepreneur visits are another common motivating factor. A first hand account of success stories beats all when it comes to being a driver.

9.      Research is a key in eliminating risk. Collaborative research should be encouraged.

10.  Programmes and projects targeting the budding entrepreneur should be introduced. I can speak of DMS, IIT Delhi. We have Prof Stan Kachnowski from the University of Columbia who comes every semester with a course on Healthcare Technologies. Healthcare is a booming industry and the sole purpose for Prof Kachnowski is to train and mentor interested candidates in making a B-Plan in the sector. He even gets people as important as the CIO of Pfizer to judge the event. The winners not only win a hefty sum but a promise for seeding if the students wish to take it forward. Such initiatives are bound to encourage students. No wonder the Healthcare Classes though optional are attended by many!!

11.  B-Plan contests are being held as part of B School events – the schools need to make efforts such as these within the college too.

 

 

 

1200 words almost and I think I can write more.. we are at that stage where we need to encourage the spirit of entrepreneurship in whichever way possible.

 

 

Remember, that in order to make a difference, you have to be different!





5 10 2008
One of those moonlit nights...

One of those moonlit nights...





iPhone vs Gphone

5 10 2008

Google, the nearly $13.5 billion search engine major, is believed to be a fortnight away from the worldwide launch of its much-awaited Google Phone (Gphone) and has started talks with service providers in India for an exclusive launch on one of their networks.

Talks are believed to be taking place with Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Essar, respectively India’s first and third largest mobile telephony operators, and state-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam.

Sources close to the development said a simultaneous launch across the US and Europe is expected, and announcements would be sent to media firms in India and other parts of the world. US regulatory approval, which is expected soon, is the only hurdle that Google is waiting to cross, they added. Google plans to invest $7-8 billion for its global telephony foray.

In India, it is also believed to be in talks with Indian providers to offer data and content and platforms including Instant Messaging (IM) and Search functions. However, these could not be confirmed.

A Google spokesperson said, “We don’t comment on market rumour or speculation. However, Google is committed to providing users with access to the world’s information, and mobile becomes more important to those efforts every day. We’re collaborating with partners worldwide to bring Google search and applications to mobile users everywhere. However, we have nothing to announce at this time.”

Reports of the Internet major getting into handset manufacturing as an answer to Apple’s iPhone has been doing rounds in cyberspace and international media for some time. These reports suggest that Google has developed a prototype that will hit the markets in a year’s time. The US-based company has neither confirmed nor denied these reports. The Wall Street Journal too had reported that Google had invested “hundreds of millions of dollars” in the project and was involved in discussions with US-based T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless.

Globally, Google is likely to participate in the upcoming auction for 700 MHz spectrum for which it is prepared to spend up to $4.6 billion. The firm is also introducing ads to YouTube videos which could be replicated on mobile phones. Ironically, Google recently partnered Apple to produce services such as e-mail and maps for its iPhone handset. And Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, said recently that more Google services for the iPhone would be rolled out.